{"id":13956,"date":"2026-03-08T14:49:36","date_gmt":"2026-03-08T17:49:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/?p=13956"},"modified":"2026-04-29T14:34:28","modified_gmt":"2026-04-29T17:34:28","slug":"a-protecao-de-dados-a-luz-da-ia-responsavel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/a-protecao-de-dados-a-luz-da-ia-responsavel\/","title":{"rendered":"Data Protection in Light of Responsible AI"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"height:9px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>**This is an AI-powered machine translation of the original text in Portuguese <br \/><br \/>\n\nThe LGPD and AI governance are not only compatible, they are interdependent. This relationship requires an approach that goes beyond procedural compliance, focusing on substantive precautions aimed at the social and individual impacts of technology use. \u201cData Protection in Light of Responsible AI\u201d critically analyzes the intersection between the LGPD and the development of AI systems from the perspective of responsible AI. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:9px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>On the one hand, a procedural approach, focusing on the formal requirements for each stage of processing. On the other, a finalistic view, focusing on the concrete effects of AI applications on rights, including informational self-determination. The study proposes a middle ground: substantive precaution, which combines the social value of privacy with the promotion of innovation and collective benefits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:9px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>The research revisits the evolution of data protection rights in Europe: from the affirmation of personality and democratic participation to the procedural accountability of the GDPR. It then recovers more recent movements returning to the social value of privacy, with emphasis on German constitutional jurisprudence and documents from the European Data Protection Board, which recognize the importance of collective trust in technological systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:9px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>In the field of AI regulation, the study analyzes the European Union's AI Act and Brazil's PL 2338\/2023, highlighting how both employ a risk-based approach. However, it is proposed that such risks be interpreted in light of AI ethics, and not only through formal categories of compliance. These ethics include values such as transparency, non-discrimination, explainability, reliability, and respect for privacy, which should guide the actions of developers, regulators, and law interpreters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:9px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>The study uses real cases to show how the substantive precautionary principle avoids the pitfalls of overly restrictive or formalistic interpretations of the LGPD. It analyzes the use of AI in credit scoring models and the processing of sensitive data in public health contexts (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), demonstrating that data protection should not be a barrier to innovation, but rather a lever for promoting fundamental values in the digital world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:54px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A LGPD e a governan\u00e7a da IA n\u00e3o s\u00f3 s\u00e3o compat\u00edveis, s\u00e3o interdependentes. Essa rela\u00e7\u00e3o exige uma abordagem que v\u00e1 al\u00e9m do cumprimento procedimental, focando na precau\u00e7\u00e3o substantiva voltada para os impactos sociais e individuais do uso da tecnologia. \u201cA Prote\u00e7\u00e3o de Dados \u00e0 Luz da IA Respons\u00e1vel\u201d analisa criticamente a interse\u00e7\u00e3o entre a LGPD [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":13960,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"tema":[41],"tipo-de-conteudo":[35],"class_list":["post-13956","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sem-categoria-pt","autor-juliano-maranhao","tema-nucleo-de-inteligencia-artificial-e-sociedade","tipo-de-conteudo-relatorio"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13956"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13956\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16243,"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13956\/revisions\/16243"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13960"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13956"},{"taxonomy":"tema","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tema?post=13956"},{"taxonomy":"tipo-de-conteudo","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalwings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tipo-de-conteudo?post=13956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}